ANALISIS KECERNAAN DAN PEMANFAATAN NUTRIEN PAKAN YANG MENGANDUNG TEPUNG KEPALA UDANG PADA KERAPU BEBEK (CROMILEPTES ALTIVELIS)

Ridwan Ridwan; Andi Idris Puspasari

doi:10.31850/jgt.v3i2.76

Authors

Ridwan Ridwan Jurusan Budidaya Perikanan Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep, Indonesia
Andi Idris Puspasari Jurusan Budidaya Perikanan Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Pangkep

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31850/jgt.v3i2.76

Abstract

This research was aimed at finding out the effect of the shrimp head meal (SHM) content found in the feed on the nutrient digestibility and utilization of humpback grouper. The research was conducted in floating net cages, and it was arranged in a completely randomized triplicate designs. The treatments in this research were the SHM contents (0 %, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, and 40 %) found in isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets. The data of each observed variable were analysed by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in order to identify the effects of treatments on the nutrient digestibility and utilization. The difference in the treatment effects were determined by Duncan’s multiple range test at significance level of 0.05.

The result of the research revealed that the protein digestibility in control diet was not significantly different from that of the diet containing SHM 10%. The protein digestibility decreased in the diets containing SHM of 20% to 40%. Meanwhile, the highest lipid digestibility was resulted from the control diet, and it decreased when SHM contents of the diets increased. The protein utilization (the protein retention and the protein efficiency ratio) and the feed efficiency (the feed conversion ratio) in the fish fed with control diet were not significantly different from those in the fish fed with the diet containing SHM of 10%. The decrease of the protein utilization and feed efficiency started to appear when the diet content of SHM had reached the level of 20%. The highest lipid retention was resulted from the control diet. The decrease of lipid retention started to appear when the diet content of SHM had reached the level of 10%. Based on the results, 10% of SHM could be included to the diet without any reduction in the protein digestibility and utilization and feed efficiency of humpback grouper.

References

Abercrombie, M., M. Hickman, M.L. Johnson, M. Thain. 1997. Kamus Lengkap Biologi. Erlangga, Jakarta. hal 668.

Akiyama, D.M., S.R. Coelho, A.L. Lawrence, E.H. Robinson. 1989. Apparent digestibility of feedstuffs by the marine shrimp Penaeus vannamei (Boone). Nippon Suisan Gakk., 55(1): 91-98.

AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. 16th Edn., AOAC International, Washington, USA.

Galindo, J. (2000). Evaluación de niveles y fuentes de proteína en la dieta de juveniles de camarón blanco Litopenaeus schmitti (Burkenroad, 1939) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). Wiñay Yachhay 4: 17-47.

Hajen, W.E., D.A. Higgs, R.M. Beames, B.S. Dosanjh. 1993. Digestibility of Various Feedstuffs by Post-Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Sea Water: 2, Measurement of Digestibility. Aquaculture, 112: 333-348.

Hertrampf, J.W., F. Piedad-Pascual. 2000. Handbook on ingredients for aquaculture feeds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. 573 pp.

Kelautan dan Perikanan dalam Angka. 2011. Pusat Data Statistik dan Informasi. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia. 120 hal.

Meyers, P., J. Samuel, E. Rutledge and S. Nonu. 1973. Variability in proximate analysis of different processed shrimp meals. Feedstuffs 44, 34 pp.

Meyers, S.P., 1986. Utilization of Shrimp Processing Wastes. Infofish Marketing Dig., 4/86, 18-19.

National Research Council. 1983. Nutrient requirement of warmwater fishes. National Academic Press, Washington. 102 pp.

Smith, R.R. 1989. Nutritional Energetics. In : Fish Nutrition. Second Edition. Edited by John E.Halver. Academic Press. California. p 1-29.

Smucker, R.A. and C.K. Kim. 1991. Chitinase activity in estuarine waters. In: Microbial enzymes in aquatic environment (edited by Ryszard J. Chrost). Springer-Verlag. New York. p 249-269.

Sudjana. 1991. Desain dan Analisis Eksperimen. Tarsito. Bandung.

Sugiura, S.H., F.M. Dong, C.K. Rathbone, R.W. Hardy. 1998. Apparent protein digestibility and minerals availabilities in various feed ingredients for salmonid feeds. Aquaculture, 159: 177-202.

Tacon, A.G.J., M. Metian, M.R. Hasan. 2009. Feed ingredients and fertilizers for farmed aquatic animals. Sources and Composition. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Papers 540. Rome. 210 pp.

Takeuchi, T. 1988. Laboratory Work-Chemical Evaluation of Dietary Nutrition. In: Fish Nutrition and Mariculture. T. Watanabe (ed.). Departement of Aquatic Biosciences, Tokyo University of Fisheries. 233 p.

Williams, K.C., G.L. Allan, D.M.Smith, and C.G.Barlow. 1997.Fishmeal Replacement in Aquaculture Diets Using Rendered Protein Meals. Paper Was Presented in 4th International Symposium on Animal Nutrition, Protein, Fats and The Environment-1997. 14p.

Wilson, R.P. 1989. Amino acids and proteins. In: John E. Halver (eds). Fish Nutrition. Academic Press, California. p 111-116