Determinants of Embryo Transfer Success in Tropical Dairy Cattle: Integrating Reproductive Performance and Institutional Factors

Authors

  • Mohamad Nurul Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi, Indonesia
  • Abd. Rohman Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi, Indonesia
  • Suherman Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31850/jgt.v15i1.1513

Keywords:

embryo transfer, reproductive biotechnology, pregnancy rate, dairy cattle, logistic regression, tropical livestock systems, agricultural innovation systems

Abstract

Embryo transfer (ET) is an advanced reproductive biotechnology widely promoted to accelerate genetic improvement and productivity of dairy cattle. However, the success of ET programs in tropical smallholder systems remains inconsistent due to the interaction of biological, environmental, and institutional factors. This study aimed to identify the determinants of ET success by integrating reproductive performance analysis with institutional implementation assessment in tropical dairy production systems. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining quantitative analysis of 200 recipient dairy cows with qualitative interviews involving farmers, technicians, and livestock officials in Pasuruan Regency, East Java, Indonesia. Binary logistic regression was employed to evaluate the influence of embryo characteristics, recipient conditions, environmental stress, disease history, and technician experience on pregnancy outcomes. The results showed that pregnancy rates ranged between 20 and 50%, with fresh embryos achieving higher success than frozen embryos. Logistic regression analysis indicated that technician experience significantly increased the probability of pregnancy (OR = 1.236; p < 0.05), highlighting the critical role of technical capacity in ET implementation. Other factors, such as embryo quality, body condition score, parity, and heat stress, showed variable but statistically nonsignificant effects. Qualitative findings further revealed that limited technical human resources, inconsistent monitoring systems, and weak institutional coordination constrained program effectiveness. These findings demonstrate that ET success in tropical dairy systems is shaped not only by reproductive biology but also by institutional and managerial conditions. Strengthening technical capacity, improving reproductive management, and integrating ET programs into regional livestock innovation systems are essential to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of reproductive biotechnology in developing dairy sectors.

Author Biographies

Mohamad Nurul, Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi

Animal Husbandry Study Program, Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi

Abd. Rohman, Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi

Animal Husbandry Study Program, Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi

Suherman, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare

Agrotechnology Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare

References

Adesogan, A. T., McKune, S. L., Serra, R., Miller, L. C., Bamikole, M. A., Laborde, J. E. A., Jr, J. C. B. D., & Adeoti, T. M. (2026). Animal board invited review: Benefits of livestock and animal-source foods in developing countries. Animal, 20(2), 101722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101722

Agus, A., Satya, T., & Widi, M. (2018). Current situation and future prospects for beef cattle production in Indonesia—A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 31(7), 976–983. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0233

Ansari, M. (2021). The environmental challenges arising from chemical pesticide overuse. Outlooks on Pest Management, 32(6), 247–248. https://doi.org/10.1564/v32_dec_05

Asai, M., Moraine, M., Ryschawy, J., De Wit, J., Hoshide, A. K., & Martin, G. (2018). Critical factors for crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level: A cross-analysis of worldwide case studies. Land use policy, 73, 184-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.010

Asmara, A., Purnamadewi, Y. L., Rindayanti, W., Achsani, M. N. F., Abdullah, A., Fadhillah, N., & Fitri, T. A. (2025). The analysis of dairy farming efficiency in East Java: Evidence post the foot and mouth disease outbreak. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 22(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.22.1.65

Asmara, A., Purnamadewi, Y. L., Rindayanti, W., Faaiz Achsani, M. N., Abdullah, A., Fadhillah, N., & Fitri, T. A. (2025). The Analysis of Dairy Farming Efficiency in East Java: Evidence Post The Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak. Journal of Management & Agribusiness/Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 22(1). DOI: 10.17358/jma.22.1.65

Bangert, E. A., & Wheeler, M. B. (2025). Assisted reproductive technologies and genetic improvement strategies for enhancing livestock production and food security in Tropical East Africa: A review. Journal of Scientific Agriculture, 9, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2025.v9.9599

Bardhan, D. (2024). Rapporteur's Report on Sustaining Livelihoods: The Role of Livestock, Poultry and Fisheries in Rural Economy. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3), 874-887. DOI:10.63040/25827510.2024.03.036

Besenfelder, U., & Havlicek, V. (2023). The interaction between the environment and embryo development in assisted reproduction. Animal reproduction, 20, e20230034. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0034

Bulletti, F. M., Sciorio, R., Conforti, A., De Luca, R., Bulletti, C., Palagiano, A., Berrettini, M., Scaravelli, G., & Pierson, R. A. (2025). Causes of embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and metaanalysis of procedures to increase embryo implantation potential. Frontiers in endocrinology, 15, 1429193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1429193

Cao, B., Qin, J., Pan, B., Qazi, I. H., Ye, J., Fang, Y., & Zhou, G. (2022). Oxidative stress and oocyte cryopreservation: recent advances in mitigation strategies involving antioxidants. Cells, 11(22), 3573. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223573

Contreras, D. A., Galina, C. S., & Chenoweth, P. (2021). Prospects for increasing the utilization of cattle embryo transfer by small-scale milk and meat producers in tropical regions. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 56(12), 1479–1485. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14015

D’Angelo, A., Panayotidis, C., Alteri, A., Mcheik, S., & Veleva, Z. (2022). Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer. Human reproduction open, 2022(4), hoac038. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac038

Enciso, K., Triana, N., Díaz, M., & Burkart, S. (2022). On (dis) connections and transformations: the role of the agricultural innovation system in the adoption of improved forages in Colombia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 741057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.741057

Fahrurrozy, M. A., Ammar, A. A., Arifin, N. A., Mentari, A., Tika B, E. M., Azzahra, P., Amin R, R., Azhary, A., Putri, A., Gasali, M., & Suherman. (2021). Pembuatan Sarabba Susu Sapi sebagai produk unggulan Desa Cendana. Jurnal Dedikasi Masyarakat, 5(1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.31850/jdm.v5i1.3234

Fernando, L., Cano, G., Lía, G., Mendoza, O., Guzmán, S. M., Tapasco, A. D., & Quintero, J. I. (2023). Agricultural innovation systems: Analysis from the subsystems of research and development, training, extension, and sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176366

Ferraz, J. B. S., Felício, P. E., Machado, P. F., & Mourão, G. B. (2016). Brazilian livestock and genetic improvement. Animal Frontiers, 6(4), 18–23.

Freudenreich, H., Aladysheva, A., & Brück, T. (2022). Weather shocks across seasons and child health: Evidence from a panel study in the Kyrgyz Republic. World Development, 155, 105801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105801

Gutiérrez Cano, L. F., Zartha Sossa, J. W., Orozco Mendoza, G. L., Suárez Guzmán, L. M., Agudelo Tapasco, D. A., & Quintero Saavedra, J. I. (2023). Agricultural innovation system: analysis from the subsystems of R&D, training, extension, and sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1176366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176366

Hansen, P. J. (2020). The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle: Why aren’t pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it? Journal of Animal Science, 98(11), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa288

Hasler, J. F. (2014). Forty years of embryo transfer in cattle: A review focusing on the journal Theriogenology, the growth of the industry in North America, and personal reminisces. Theriogenology, 81(1), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.010

Hew, Y., Kutuk, D., Duzcu, T., Ergun, Y., & Basar, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in IVF laboratories: elevating outcomes through precision and efficiency. Biology, 13(12), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13120988

Huang, J. Y., Chen, H. Y., Tan, S. L., & Chian, R. C. (2006). Effects of osmotic stress and cryoprotectant toxicity on mouse oocyte fertilization and subsequent embryonic development in vitro. Cell Preservation Technology, 4(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpt.2006.4.149

Jenkins, W. M., Trindade, L. M., Pyett, S., van Mierlo, B., Welch, D., & van Zanten, H. H. (2024). Will the protein transition lead to sustainable food systems?. Global Food Security, 43, 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100809

Kedang, V. M. K., Permatasari, I., Chanchaidechachai, T., & Inchaisri, C. (2025). Spatial-temporal distribution and risk factors of foot and mouth disease outbreaks in Java Island, Indonesia from 2022 to 2023. BMC Veterinary Research, 21(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04621-2

Khade, S. B., Khillare, R. S., & Dastagiri, M. B. (2021). Global livestock development: Policies and vision. Indian J. Anim. Sci, 91(9), 770-779. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v91i9.116470

Khan, I., Mesalam, A., Heo, Y. S., Lee, S. H., Nabi, G., & Kong, I. K. (2023). Heat stress as a barrier to successful reproduction and potential alleviation strategies in cattle. Animals, 13(14), 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13142359

Leroy, G., Besbes, B., Boettcher, P., Hoffmann, I., Pilling, D., Baumung, R., & Scherf, B. (2016). Factors and determinants of animal genetic resources management activities across the world. Livestock Science, 189, 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.05.006

Lestari, T. D., Ismudiono, I., & Sardjito, T. (2019). Breeding performance of Indonesian beef cattle as recipients for embryo transfer. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 81(11), 1688–1691. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.19-0429

Marlina, I., Wibowo, G., Bastias, D. D., Sijapati Basnett, B., Prasetyo, D. D., & Nasiir, M. (2024). Counting the costs: Understanding the extra costs of living with disability in Indonesia to advance inclusive policies within the SDG framework. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2024.1236365

Mueller, M. L., & Van Eenennaam, A. L. (2022). Synergistic power of genomic selection, assisted reproductive technologies, and gene editing to drive genetic improvement of cattle. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-022-00080-z

Priyanto, L., Nurdin, A. S., Ekowati, I. A., Maemunah, S., & Putranti, D. (2024). Pengaruh pasca penyakit mulut dan kuku (PMK) terhadap estrus dan kebuntingan sapi potong di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Cannarium: Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan, 22(2), 4–6.

Rahmatillah, R. S., Rahmat, D., & Dudi, D. (2024). Genetic quality improvement of beef cattle in Indonesia: Overview and prospects. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 12(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v12i3.p258-271

Rensis, F. D., Garcia-Ispierto, I., & López-Gatius, F. (2015). Seasonal heat stress: Clinical implications and hormone treatments for the fertility of dairy cows. Theriogenology, 84(5), 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.04.021

Setyo, N., Humaidah, N., & Kentjonowaty, I. (2024). Kajian sapi peranakan Friesian Holstein (PFH) dengan riwayat penyakit mulut dan kuku (PMK) terhadap kejadian gangguan reproduksi. Dinamika Rekasatwa, 7(1), 381–384.

Shortall, S., & Brown, D. L. (2019). Guest editorial: Thinking about rural inequalities as a cross-national research project. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.001

Sini, I., Handayani, N., Pratiwi, A., Polim, A. A., & Boediono, A. (2020). Blastocyst elective single embryo transfer improves perinatal outcomes among women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in Indonesia. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, 9(3), 118-123. DOI: 10.4103/2305-0500.284268

Syahdan, R., Atabany, A., Komala, I., & Ningtias, P. I. (2025). Analysis of embryo transfer pregnancy rate from Friesian Holstein cow recipients in BET Cipelang. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 13(2), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v13i2.p399-411

Tangkas, M., Putra, I. M. M., & Endarwati, J. (2025). A predictive model for in vitro fertilization success: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary clinic in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Perinatology, 6(2), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.51559/inajperinatol.v6i2.84

Wu, G., Bazer, F. W., & Cross, H. R. (2014). Land?based production of animal protein: impacts, efficiency, and sustainability. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1328(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12566

Yadav, J. N., Singh, H. K., Yadav, V., & Diwakar, R. P. (2025). Artificial insemination and embryo transfer: Emerging technologies in the livestock industry. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 10(2), 610868. DOI: 10.22161/ijeab

Downloads

Published

10-04-2026

How to Cite

Nurul, M., Rohman, A., & Suherman. (2026). Determinants of Embryo Transfer Success in Tropical Dairy Cattle: Integrating Reproductive Performance and Institutional Factors . Journal Galung Tropika, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31850/jgt.v15i1.1513

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.